Pool Payout Simulator
Compare Bitcoin mining pool payout methods via Monte Carlo simulation. Analyze PPS, FPPS, PPLNS earnings, variance, and stability.
Day-to-day operational decisions, hardware evaluation, and risk management
Saved input sources
Based on network data from Oct 14, 2026, 05:15:04 UTC
Fee revenue per block
0.0179 BTC (7-day) · 0.0173 BTC (24-hour) · mempool.space reward stats (saved snapshot)
Updated Oct 14, 2026, 05:15:04 UTC
Network snapshot
Block 971,354 · 950.0 EH/s (difficulty-implied)
Hashrate derived from current difficulty via mempool.space (saved snapshot)
Pool Payout Strategy Simulator
≈ 132.72 T
Fee share of block revenue: 0.6%
Wall power incl. overhead: 3.498 kW
Fills hashrate, power and price — you can still edit them.
Mining Hardware
Network & Simulation
Results update automatically as you change inputs.
| Method | Daily (USD) | Monthly Profit | Std Dev | CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PPS Pay Per Share | $12.32 | $183.25 | ±$0.00 | 0.0% |
FPPS Full Pay Per Share | $12.39 | $185.40 | ±$0.00 | 0.0% |
PPLNS Pay Per Last N Shares | $12.39 | $185.40 | ±$2.34 | 18.9% |
Proportional | $12.39 | $185.40 | ±$3.31 | 26.7% |
PPS
FPPS
PPLNS
Proportional
About the Pool Payout Strategy Simulator
Different mining pools use different compensation methods, each with distinct risk/reward tradeoffs. This simulator runs Monte Carlo simulations to compare how PPS, FPPS, PPLNS, and Proportional payouts affect your expected earnings, income variance, and worst/best case outcomes over time.
Payout Methods
- PPS: Fixed pay per share. Pool absorbs luck risk. Excludes tx fees. Most stable.
- FPPS: PPS + estimated transaction fees. Slightly higher earnings, still stable.
- PPLNS: Pays based on recent pool luck. Moderate variance; same long-run expected value as other methods.
- Proportional: Pays per round contribution. Highest variance, mirrors raw mining luck.
Key Statistics
- Coefficient of Variation (CV): Std dev / mean — lower = more predictable income.
- P5 / P95: 5th and 95th percentile monthly earnings — your realistic range.
- Cumulative chart: Shows how luck-based methods converge to (or diverge from) PPS over time.
Mathematical Equations
Base Daily BTC (PPS)
BTC/day = (H / NH) × 144 × R
H = miner hashrate (H/s), NH = network hashrate, R = block reward. FPPS adds transaction fees to R.
Variance Modeling
σ = E[daily] × Vmethod
PPS and FPPS pay a fixed rate per share, so your payout has no luck variance (the pool absorbs it). PPLNS and Proportional swing with the pool's block-finding luck, modeled as Poisson for a pool with ~10% of network hashrate — smaller pools swing more.
Monte Carlo Simulation
Eₜ ~ N(μ, σ²) for each day t
Daily earnings are drawn from a normal distribution. Multiple simulations are averaged to produce stable expected outcomes.
Coefficient of Variation
CV = σ / μ
Dimensionless measure of income predictability. Lower CV = more consistent daily payouts. Critical for cash flow planning.
